Some clear thinking here by Alan Jacobs.
It’s easy enough in the US or Europe to speak of something called “post-Christianity”. But to what extent can a culture re-paganize when it was never fully converted in the first place?
And I don’t just mean just the Majority World. Here’s Camily Paglia in a recent interview with Carl Trueman:
Yes, despite being an atheist, I remain (as I like to put it) Italian pagan Catholic—which has very little to do with Christianity as it first emerged from ancient Palestine. The Northern European Protestant reformers were quite right to condemn how far the Church of Rome had strayed from the Bible. My people of the Italian countryside never really surrendered their paganism. They simply renamed their gods (the Roman Janus became Saint Januarius—San Gennaro) and re-crowned Isis and Magna Mater as the Madonna. My mother’s baptismal church in Ceccano in Southern Lazio, Santa Maria a Fiume (“on the river”), sits on the foundations of a temple to the Empress Agrippina, which in turn replaced a temple to the goddess Minerva.
The world is odder, scarier, richer, more hostile, more permeable than we tend to think. After all, relative to the rest of the world and the rest of history, we’re the WEIRD ones.
I’m sure Lewis is right that it’s a “false idea that the historical process allows mere reversal”. As he says, “a post-Christian man is not a Pagan; you might as well think that a married woman recovers her virginity by divorce.”
But let’s strain that metaphor. What if she wasn’t ever married? What if she just had a long-term relationship, and instead of divorce it’s a slow, messy, breakup full of false starts, false recoveries, finally more with a whimper than a bang?